How Product Vendors Can Prepare Clinical Data for AI Effectively

As artificial intelligence continues to reshape healthcare, clinical data and AI are becoming deeply intertwined. Indeed, one of the biggest roadblocks for AI in healthcare isn’t the algorithms—it’s the data. Traditional clinical datasets are often incomplete, inconsistent, or trapped in outdated systems that don’t talk to each other. For B2B healthtech startups building AI tools that rely on patient records, lab results, or treatment histories, this mess can delay development, distort model performance, or lead to costly rework down the line.

As AI and machine learning in clinical trial adoption pick up speed, getting your clinical data in shape early is a product advantage. Whether you’re building a decision support tool, predictive model, or personalized treatment engine, your ability to structure, standardize, and govern your data stack can make or break your roadmap.

This guide is for teams already building AI-driven healthcare solutions. You’ve secured funding, validated your use case, and now face real-world data challenges. From messy records and inconsistent formats to integration hurdles and early scaling pains, this guide will help you move forward with a focus on clinical data management with AI, not generic AI pipelines.

We’ll walk through key steps to make your healthcare data AI-ready—whether it’s clinical, financial, medication-related, or administrative. We’ll cover how artificial intelligence enhances the clinical data review process. You’ll also get valuable info on how to clean and label data for ML, what governance checkpoints to set up, and how to future-proof your pipeline for scalability.

We will also consider FHIR as one of the most effective approaches for preparing healthcare data for AI, supported by our FHIR services. 

Highlights:

• AI in healthcare works best when powered by clean, well-structured clinical research data.
• FHIR enables better data quality, outcome sharing, and compliance, making AI products more market-oriented.
• Combining FHIR servers with lakehouse enables flexible data usage and efficient training of machine learning models.

What Makes Clinical Data AI-Ready?

Structured data isn’t always AI-ready, especially in healthcare. A spreadsheet full of diagnosis codes may look neat, but unless that data is standardized, clean, and labeled properly, it won’t help your AI model make safe decisions. 

Here’s what it takes to make clinical data ready for training and deploying AI models:

• Standardized using medical ontologies. SNOMED CT, LOINC, ICD-10, and others help your data speak the same language across systems and teams.
• Normalized and cleaned. Dates, units, terminology, and formats must be consistent. Duplicates and missing values? They introduce bias quickly.
• Properly labeled. Supervised learning models need clearly annotated inputs, often with clinical validation.
• Integrative. Tools for pulling data from EMRs, lab systems, and third-party APIs are essential — the core focus of our healthcare integration services. You can’t train models on data you can’t access.
• Interoperable. Your AI-processed data should be accessible and usable across systems. Interoperability standards like FHIR  help here, but only if implemented thoughtfully. Learn more about healthcare interoperability strategy in our recent article.

Preparing FHIR-based clinical data for AI can drastically reduce preprocessing time, allowing researchers to focus on building and validating models rather than cleaning up messy datasets.

How to Prepare Clinical Data for AI: Core Steps for Medical Startups

Whether you’re building a clinical decision support tool or an AI-powered platform for diagnostics or population health, these steps will help you turn your real-world data into model-ready input for AI in clinical data management:

1. Data discovery and evaluation. Identify what data you have, where it lives, how it’s formatted, and how clean or complete it is. Know what’s missing.

2. Cleaning and normalization. Harmonize data formats, fix obvious errors, resolve duplicates, and create consistent representations for key fields.

3. Structuring with standards. Wherever possible, map your data to healthcare standards like FHIR for interoperability, SNOMED CT for clinical terminology, and LOINC for lab results. This ensures compliance and makes AI pipelines reusable and scalable.

4. Deidentification and privacy. Use tokenization or pseudonymization techniques that align with HIPAA/GDPR. Done right, privacy measures don’t block your AI plans—they enable them.

5. Labeling and annotation. Your model is only as good as the data you feed it. Expert-validated labeling, or rule-based pre-labeling tools, can dramatically improve outcomes.

6. Build your integration layer early. Set up connectors with EMRs, third-party tools, and APIs. These are often the bottleneck in real-world deployments, not the model itself.

Following this process creates a solid foundation for building AI-ready clinical datasets that can accelerate research and improve trial outcomes.

Why FHIR Is the Gold Standard for Data Preparation and Result Sharing

FHIR is a strategic choice for AI in clinical trials. Adopting FHIR from the start gives you a consistent data structure that simplifies training AI models, reduces preprocessing time, and supports traceability and versioning across datasets.

FHIR is also designed with regulatory compliance in mind. If your product falls under ONC regulations—for example, by integrating with certified health IT—a FHIR-based infrastructure helps ensure alignment with these requirements, reducing the need for costly adjustments later.

Finally, FHIR is interoperable by design, making your product easier to integrate with other systems, whether you’re targeting providers, payers, or public health platforms. This flexibility allows startups to build region-agnostic and scalable solutions across different markets.

At Edenlab, we’ve spent years helping healthcare organizations prepare, normalize, and structure data for analytics and AI through our healthcare analytics services. Based on this experience, we’ve developed the Kodjin Data Platform—a high-performance, FHIR-native storage solution tailored for healthcare data. It’s a suite of tools that simplify the core stages of the data preparation pipeline—from extraction and transformation to standardization and patient identity resolution. 

Our ELT solution streamlines the loading and normalization of healthcare records, while the Kodjin Terminology Service enables automatic mapping to standards like SNOMED CT and LOINC. These tools are flexible and can be used across both FHIR-native and non-FHIR systems. For projects that require accurate patient matching, we also offer components to support custom Master Patient Index (MPI) solutions. These tools provide a solid foundation for building AI-ready, interoperable, and scalable healthcare data pipelines.

Data Architecture Layers for AI Solutions in Healthcare

We’ll explore three key architectural layers in AI products that are involved in data preparation and enabling analytics and model application:

• Physical layer: infrastructure and data storage;
• Transformation layer: data cleansing, aggregation, and normalization;
• Analytical layer: enabling analytics and model consumption.

The Physical Storage Layer is the foundation for all data in your AI architecture. Depending on your setup, it can be a FHIR server, a lakehouse, or both.

If your AI product relies on healthcare data from multiple sources, especially in different formats, and needs to standardize, clean, and structure that data before analysis, a FHIR-native approach is a strong fit. In this setup, a transformation layer—handling tasks like mapping, deduplication, and normalization—is typically placed before or integrated with the FHIR server. The FHIR server then acts as your physical storage layer, allowing you to aggregate and manage high-quality, interoperable data. This ensures compliance, supports downstream use, and prepares the data for analysis. However, since FHIR isn’t query-friendly by default, you’ll also need an analytical layer, such as Databricks or Snowflake, to make the data usable for training and running AI models.

Still, not all AI products require a FHIR server. If your solution focuses on training models and generating insights from aggregated data and doesn’t need to expose or return that data in FHIR format, then a lakehouse alone may be sufficient. In this case, the lakehouse acts as a physical and analytical layer, with built-in ELT capabilities to handle internal data transformation and normalization. Lakehouses support structured and unstructured data and integrate smoothly with modern ML/AI tools, making them ideal for quickly and efficiently building AI-powered apps.

In practice, your choice depends on what your AI product is trying to achieve — whether you’re building a full-scale healthcare analytics solution or a narrower predictive module:

When a lakehouse is enough:

• Ingest and process both structured and unstructured data (e.g., clinical notes, images, lab results)
• Do not need to expose or return data in FHIR format
• Are self-contained tools or apps (e.g., risk prediction, image classification)
• Rely on built-in ELT pipelines for data aggregation, normalization, and transformation within a single platform.

When a FHIR server is essential:

• Ingest data from multiple, heterogeneous healthcare sources (EHRs, EMRs, labs, devices)
• Standardize, clean, and structure data upfront for compliance and interoperability
• Expose AI-generated insights via APIs to external stakeholders
• Integrate with regulated EHR or national-level healthcare systems
• Support further clinical use or regulatory reporting.
  

In such cases, the FHIR server acts as the physical layer, responsible for maintaining standardized, high-quality, and interoperable data. A separate analytical layer makes this data queryable and usable for AI.

Importantly, the FHIR repository can also play a dual role—not just as a standardized intake and transformation layer, but also as a way to deliver processed data back to stakeholders in a unified, accessible format.

Most real-world healthcare AI platforms end up with hybrid architectures. They combine the strengths of FHIR for structure and compliance and the scalability and flexibility of lakehouses for large-scale analytics and ML workflows, with the transformation layer acting as a bridge between raw inputs and AI-ready data.

One of Edenlab’s clients—a US-based health data platform—needed to process clinical and claims data from providers and payers to support primary and specialty care and research into stem cell and alternative therapies.

The platform relied on graph and AI-based analytics to surface data quality issues and generate insights. A FHIR-based approach was a perfect fit: it served as the physical storage layer, ensured standardized and clean inputs for analytics, and supported integration with diverse systems. It also helped the client meet US compliance requirements and build a foundation for global regulatory readiness.

Our Kodjin FHIR server can be a compliant, API-accessible physical data layer that aggregates patient data from diverse clinical systems after transformation. Unlike traditional storage solutions, Kodjin provides structured and standardized access to clinical data, which is essential when working with AI models that require clean and interoperable outcomes. It enables real-time integration with EHRs and national health information exchanges, making it ideal for AI applications that must operate in complex, regulated environments.

Proven in national-scale deployments with over 40 million users and 10,000+ providers, Kodjin offers a robust foundation for building AI products that depend on reliable, consistent access to longitudinal patient data.

Regulatory Risks and How to Avoid Them

If your AI product supports diagnosis, clinical decisions, or treatment recommendations, it may be classified as Software as a Medical Device (SaMD)—which introduces additional regulatory obligations. To be marketed in the US or EU, such tools often require FDA approval or a CE mark, respectively. These certifications signal safety and efficacy and are critical for earning provider trust and ensuring compliance.

Clinical trial data comes with heavy regulatory baggage, and the risks for AI teams aren’t abstract. From HIPAA in the US to GDPR in Europe, compliance failures often stem from simple oversights: exporting data to shadow environments, skipping audit logging, or using identifiable data during model testing.

Startups working with US providers should also consider ONC compliance — our EHR software development services enable platforms that integrate with certified health IT modules. Neglecting it can limit your product’s integration and commercial viability in the healthcare ecosystem. While AI-only products typically don’t require ONC certification, it becomes relevant if your solution includes broader functionality—for example, features that enable interaction with EHR systems.

To stay on the safe side, build in privacy from the start. Use pseudonymization and access controls, track all actions with audit trails, and isolate your model testing environments from real-world identifiers.

We recently worked with Elation Health to deliver a FHIR-compliant solution that integrates ElationEMR with the FHIR standard. Edenlab developed a clinical data mapper using configurable ETL templates aligned with US interoperability standards, enabling a smooth transformation of EHR data into FHIR resources. The solution runs in a secure, scalable cloud environment with robust privacy features, while SMART on FHIR support ensures safe and compliant third-party app integrations.

Conclusion

In conclusion, building impactful AI solutions—especially in clinical data science—requires far more than advanced algorithms. In conclusion, building impactful AI solutions — especially in digital health — means delivering custom AI solutions for healthcare built on clean, secure, well-organised data pipelines.

The true foundation lies in the quality and structure of the data that feeds those models. Clean, secure, and well-organized data pipelines directly influence the accuracy, reliability, and compliance of AI applications. Without this foundation, even the most promising AI models can underperform or fail to meet critical regulatory standards.

For early-stage ML and digital health startups, establishing these data foundations early on is essential. It sets the stage for long-term success by enabling scalable development, smoother integration with clinical workflows, and readiness for future innovations.

At Edenlab, we understand the unique challenges startups face with artificial intelligence in clinical data management. Our team brings deep expertise in healthcare data standards, interoperability, and compliant data architectures to help you build AI-ready pipelines that are robust from day one.

FAQs

Do I need regulatory approval just to test my AI model internally?

Generally, no regulatory approval is needed for internal model development using de-identified data or synthetic data. However, once you start testing with real patient data or in clinical settings, you’ll likely need IRB approval at minimum. If your AI tool influences clinical decisions, you’ll eventually need FDA clearance. For those exploring artificial intelligence in clinical trials, regulatory oversight becomes especially important. Start building relationships with regulatory healthcare technology consultants early—they can help you design studies that streamline future approval processes.

What are the red flags when evaluating a clinical dataset for AI use?

Watch out for datasets with poor documentation, inconsistent coding standards, or missing audit trails. High percentages of missing values (>20% for key fields), unclear data lineage, or inability to verify data quality are major concerns. Be wary of datasets that lack proper consent for AI/research use, have unclear ownership rights, or come from sources that can’t demonstrate HIPAA compliance. Always validate a sample before committing to large datasets.

Can I use synthetic patient data to train an MVP before accessing real datasets?

Yes, synthetic data is excellent for MVP development and can help you refine algorithms before accessing real patient data. Tools like Synthea generate realistic EHR data, while companies like MDClone provide synthetic clinical datasets. However, remember that synthetic data has limitations—it may not capture rare conditions or complex patient interactions that real data contains. Use synthetic data to prove technical feasibility, but plan to validate with real data before making clinical claims.

What should I look for in a partner to help with clinical data preparation?

Choose partners with demonstrable healthcare experience, not just general data engineering expertise. Look for HIPAA compliance certifications, experience with clinical data standards (HL7, FHIR), and a track record working with healthcare organizations. They should understand medical coding (ICD-10, CPT), have robust audit trail capabilities, and offer end-to-end services from extraction to quality validation. If your goal is clinical data preparation for machine learning, make sure they also have experience structuring data for downstream AI applications. References from other healthcare AI companies are invaluable.

Stay in touch

Subscribe to get insights from FHIR experts, new case studies, articles and announcements

Please leave this field empty.

Δ

Great!

Our team we’ll be glad to share our expertise with you via email