HIPAA compliance and healthcare data sharing are not just IT checkboxes—they’re core requirements for modern digital health platforms operating in the U.S. While HIPAA is a U.S. law, it applies to any organization, whether based in the U.S. or not, that stores, processes, or transmits protected health information (PHI) of U.S. residents. That includes both B2B and B2C solutions. If your platform processes identifiable health data related to care delivery, billing, or operations, even indirectly, it likely falls under the scope of HIPAA compliance in healthcare IT systems. Some wellness apps may fall outside its scope, but if they integrate with providers or EHRs, they may still trigger compliance requirements.
Despite new technologies and digital health tools, breaches are accelerating: in 2023, the U.S. experienced 725 large healthcare data breaches, exposing over 133 million records, more than any previous year. Traditional compliance checklists can’t keep up with API-driven ecosystems, rapid data flows, and new data types, such as genomics and app-to-app integrations.
The real risk? Governance gaps. Most breaches are not due to missing technology but to failures in oversight, vendor management, and real-time monitoring.
This article is for health tech leaders and teams responsible for HIPAA-compliant patient data exchange and infrastructure—from CIOs and product managers at digital health companies to architects behind national eHealth platforms.
You’ll find real-world examples, modern architectural principles, and actionable insights on designing systems that meet HIPAA privacy, security, and PHI traceability standards by design, not as an afterthought.
Highlights:
- 133M+ U.S. patient records were exposed in healthcare data breaches in 2023, the highest on record.
- 725 large-scale healthcare breaches were reported in the U.S. in a single year.
- 66% of these breaches involved third-party vendors or business associates.
What HIPAA Is and Why It Matters in 2025
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 establishes the standard on how protected health information (PHI) must be handled, stored, and shared. Software teams must be strict with the two key rules: the Privacy Rule, which limits how PHI can be used and disclosed, and the Security Rule, which sets specific requirements for protecting electronic PHI (ePHI).
In 2025, the scope of PHI has grown far beyond standard EHRs. It now covers:
- Genomic data used in personalized treatment plans
- Patient-generated health data from wearables and apps
- API-based data exchange between health platforms
These developments introduce new risks. Many digital health platforms struggle to keep up, especially when scaling quickly. We often see:
- Incomplete or outdated logging and breach response protocols
- Lack of traceability for third-party PHI access
- Consent flows that don’t extend to external APIs
Recognizing these issues, HHS offered significant updates to the HIPAA Security Rule in January 2025. These changes aim to address modern cybersecurity threats and cover the following:
- Mandatory encryption: Ensuring data is unreadable without proper authorization.
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA): Adding an extra layer of security beyond passwords.
- Annual technical inventories and network mapping: Keeping track of all devices and data flows.
- Enhanced vendor oversight: Requiring business associates to notify entities within 24 hours of activating a contingency plan.
- Formalized incident response planning: Preparing for and managing security incidents effectively.
- Regular compliance audits: Ensuring ongoing adherence to security standards.
That is why HIPAA-compliant software development is so important in today’s healthcare technology. It ensures that privacy precautions are built into the system design rather than implemented after the fact, allowing platforms to scale securely and responsibly.
The Role of HIPAA in Regulating Health Data Sharing
Sharing patient data across systems, vendors, and apps is no longer a niche requirement; it’s the backbone of modern healthcare. But with that comes a complex compliance reality. HIPAA requirements for health data sharing establish the baseline for how protected health information (PHI) must be secured and accessed. Yet, these requirements alone may be insufficient for organizations facilitating large-scale data exchange.
Recent regulations from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have established new requirements for interoperability and patient access to health information. The 21st Century Cures Act now requires health systems to do more than simply protect patient data—they must ensure it’s accessible, secure, transparent, and provided in formats that machines can read and process.
HIPAA-compliant data sharing goes beyond securing individual systems; it requires governing entire data flows: who can access what, under which consent, and with what level of traceability.
At Edenlab, we specialize in this intersection. Our work on national eHealth systems and SMART on FHIR integrations reflects a deep understanding of HIPAA and broader U.S. interoperability rules. That’s why we treat HIPAA compliance and healthcare data sharing as core design principles—baked into every API, audit log, and access token from the start.
Governance and Risk Gaps in Today’s Systems
Even with secure infrastructure, healthcare systems often fail at the governance level, especially when external vendors are involved. The common issues?
- Incomplete audit logs and breach response processes
- Consent flows that don’t extend to third-party APIs
- Limited traceability around who accessed patient data and why
The gap usually starts with vendor management. Too often, they are onboarded without a clear evaluation of their security practices. At Edenlab, we advise teams to go beyond SLAs and assess external partners through a regulatory compliance-focused lens. Our internal checklist includes:
- Traceability: Can the vendor provide a full access history for the PHI they touch?
- Token lifecycle: How are access tokens issued, scoped, and revoked?
- Access control: Do they support fine-grained, role-based access with logging?
- Breach handling: What’s their incident response policy, and do they test it?
- Consent propagation: Can they enforce consent across federated systems?
This level of scrutiny is essential in modern architectures with multiple APIs and decentralized data flows. HIPAA governance in multi-tenant platforms is much like an iceberg: encryption and access controls are the visible tip, but the real strength lies beneath in the governance practices, audits, and accountability measures that ensure lasting trust and compliance.
Need guidance on regulatory compliance?
We are here to help. Check our
Healthcare regulatory compliance solutions pageHIPAA-Grade Architecture: Core Requirements
Building HIPAA-compliant software goes far beyond encryption checkboxes. For systems that store and share health data, whether between providers, apps, or platforms, security and auditability must be built into the architecture from day one. To support secure healthcare data exchange at scale and ensure effective HIPAA rule enforcement, modern software architectures should be built with security and compliance at their core.
- Strong encryption: Use TLS 1.2 or higher for data in transit and AES-256 for data at rest to protect sensitive health information at all times.
- Role-based access controls and Zero Trust principles: Enforce fine-grained permissions based on defined user roles and authenticate users based on context, not just credentials. This limits exposure and helps ensure that only the right people access the right data.
- Identity and token lifecycle management: Implement OAuth2 with clearly scoped, consent-bound tokens. Support Single Sign-On (SSO) and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) to strengthen identity security across all touchpoints.
- Real-time logging and traceability: Maintain a detailed, audit-ready log of every user action, data request, and system event. This enables early breach detection, supports compliance reporting, and reinforces accountability.
This is precisely the kind of architecture Edenlab delivers through our Kodjin FHIR Server and custom projects. For example, when we developed a FHIR-based semantic analysis platform for a global pharma company, our solution included encrypted pipelines and access controls for sensitive research data, ensuring HIPAA-level protection at every step.
A recent case with Elation Health, a leading EHR platform in the U.S., illustrates this approach well. Facing tight deadlines to comply with the 21st Century Cures Act and USCORE 5.0.1 standards, Elation partnered with Edenlab to deploy a secure, FHIR-compliant backend using Kodjin. We enabled a seamless data transition without redesigning their entire platform, implemented SMART on FHIR functionality, and ensured full data traceability and secure app-to-app integrations—all essential components of HIPAA-grade architecture.
We apply the same principles to the development of health information exchanges. For insights into common pitfalls and best practices in building HIE systems, see our deep-dive article on real-world interoperability at scale.
Designing for Compliance-Ready Deployment
Compliance isn’t an add-on when building healthcare platforms across multiple regions—it’s a foundation. At Edenlab, we architect compliance-ready systems by design, ensuring data isolation, patient privacy, and flexible deployment per local regulations.
From per-tenant key isolation and scoped tokens to flexible cloud or on-premises options, our solutions are built to support secure, scalable, and compliant deployment models—whether for national systems or personal healthcare apps.
For instance, Edenlab built the National Clinical Data Repository (NCDR) with pseudonymized storage, attribute-based access control, and data deduplication for over 40 million patients to digitize the entire country’s primary health records. All actions are traceable through signed documents, ensuring non-disreputability and regulatory tech compliance.
Another case in mind is Turbota, a personal health app. With federated APIs and a FHIR-based backend, the application lets users link multiple health accounts, manage access to their own data, and share records securely, meeting interoperability and privacy demands in a mobile-first world.
Conclusion
Modern healthcare platforms must treat HIPAA and patient data privacy as foundational principles, embedding security, traceability, and privacy into every layer of their systems. That means designing architectures where audit logs, encryption, consent management, and vendor governance are not afterthoughts but core capabilities. It also means staying ahead of regulatory shifts, such as the 2025 HIPAA updates, with flexible, scalable systems built for change.
With healthcare data analytics services, you can go one step further—leveraging your HIPAA-compliant architecture not just to protect data, but to extract insights, support reporting, and guide strategic decisions across your health technology ecosystem.
At Edenlab, we believe compliance isn’t about slowing down innovation but enabling it. Trust and security will set you apart whether you’re building a national data exchange, a mobile health app, or an AI-powered diagnostics tool. Our experience with FHIR, SMART, and HIPAA-grade architecture—from large-scale public health systems to private digital platforms—gives us a unique perspective on what it takes to deliver compliance at scale.
If you’re navigating HIPAA regulations for healthcare data exchange or aiming to enhance your data governance, we’re here to help you design systems that are secure from the start and built to scale with confidence.
Build a HIPAA-grade healthcare platform with confidence
From governance frameworks to resilient architectures, we design secure, compliant systems that protect patient data and scale with your needs. Whether modernizing existing infrastructure or starting fresh, Edenlab provides the expertise to get you there.
FAQ
What’s the difference between HIPAA and HITRUST?
HIPAA establishes rules for storing, accessing, and sharing PHI. It is mandatory for covered entities and business associates. HITRUST, on the other hand, is a certifiable security framework that assists enterprises in demonstrating compliance with HIPAA standards and those set by NIST and ISO.
How do you assess if a cloud vendor is HIPAA-compliant?
HIPAA vendor compliance requires that any cloud provider handling protected PHI offer a Business Associate Agreement (BAA) outlining how it secures that data. But that’s just the starting point. You should also evaluate their encryption methods, access control policies, audit logging, breach response processes, and track records with third-party audit controls or certifications. Don’t rely on checklists—ask how they support real-time traceability, consent propagation, and vendor transparency across APIs.
What are the first steps for a hospital system to modernize HIPAA workflows?
Start by mapping where and how patient data moves across your systems, especially across apps, APIs, and external vendors. Identify any legacy infrastructure that lacks modern access controls or logging. From there, focus on centralizing patient identity management, updating consent flows, and embedding privacy and security principles into the architecture. The goal isn’t just compliance; it’s building patient trust through secure, traceable data practices.
How can healthcare platforms track user access in real time?
Modern platforms use structured audit logs, combined with real-time alerting systems such as SIEMs (e.g., Splunk, Datadog, or ELK Stack). These tools capture every meaningful action: who accessed what data, when, from where, and for what purpose. To go a step further, organizations are now tying these logs to consent records and role-based policies, helping them monitor access and explain and justify it if a breach occurs.
Which tools help automate HIPAA audit preparation?
Platforms like Vanta, Drata, or Tugboat Logic help automate compliance prep by collecting system evidence, managing policy updates, and tracking vendor risks. In healthcare-specific settings, it is critical to have solutions that enable audit-ready logs, role-based access documentation, and unambiguous data lineage. Automation will not replace governance, but it can make audits more efficient, cleaner, and less painful.
Stay in touch
Subscribe to get insights from FHIR experts, new case studies, articles and announcements
Great!
Our team we’ll be glad to share our expertise with you via email
